The 3:1 Model for School-Based SLPs: What the “Flex Week” Really Looks Like (Podcast Recap)

Exciting news… we have been featured on the popular podcast, SLP Coffee Talk, with Hallie of Speech Time Fun! Chatting with Hallie was easy, and it was one of those conversations that felt instantly familiar. 

We talked about the 3:1 model, but not in a textbook way. More like: why it keeps coming up when caseloads are heavy, schedules are packed, and the indirect work is somehow expected to happen in invisible time. We shared a lot about how we got started with it in our district, how we currently implement it, and how we explain it to administrators, teachers, and families. Spoiler alert: the 3:1 model has changed our service delivery and we are BIG fans!

The part we kept coming back to

The 3:1 model is simple to explain.

Three weeks direct.One week indirect.

But what we really talked about is the part school-based SLPs live every day: the indirect work is not optional. It’s just usually unpaid in time.

So when people say “3:1 sounds nice,” the real translation is:“I want a structure that makes this job doable long-term.”

A few moments from the episode that stuck with me

Not a list of tips. Just real moments that felt true:

• The “1 week” is not a break. It’s where the work behind the work finally has a place to live.

• If the flex week has no plan, it turns into catch-up week, and people walk away thinking the model does not work.

• A lot of pushback disappears when you can clearly explain what the flex week actually looks like for students and teams.

• This is not about doing less. It’s about making services more sustainable and functional for the students

  
  

That’s the heart of it.

Where the Toolkit fits (quick mention, not the whole point)

Hallie and I  briefly touched on why so many people struggle to implement 3:1 consistently, and it’s not because they don’t understand it, but because they don’t have tools to make it repeatable.

That’s why we built the 3:1 Model Toolkit. It’s support for the practical pieces, not another explanation of the model.

Listen to the episode here

If 3:1 has been on your mind at all, this episode will feel worth your time. 321: How the 3:1 Model Supports School-Based SLP Burnout

Quick prompt for you after you listen: What part made you think, “yes, this is exactly my school life”?

---

Connect with Speech Time Fun

Instagram: @speechtimefunFacebook: Speech Time FunYouTube: @Speechtimefun Website: SpeechTimeFun.com

Listen on your next drive or between meetings, then send it to one school-based SLP who is constantly doing indirect work on borrowed time. If it sparks a question, that’s a good sign. That’s where planning gets easier.

How to Make More Money as a School-Based Therapist Without Taking on Extra Work

Why Most Income Advice for School-Based Therapists Falls Short

Most school-based therapists do not avoid thinking about money because they lack ambition.

They avoid it because the conversation is rarely structured in a way that makes planning feel clear, practical, or actionable.

There are too many ideas floating around. Side jobs. Stipends. Courses. Waiting it out. And almost no one ever puts these options next to each other in a way that makes decision-making feel calm.

This short exercise is designed to do exactly that.

You don’t need to commit to anything. You just need one page and a few honest answers.

Step 1: Write Down How You Currently Earn Income

On a piece of paper (or in a notes app), list everything that currently affects your income.

Examples might include:

• Your base salary

• Extra duties or stipends

• Side work or contract work

• Coursework you have already completed

• Years of experience or step increases

Do not evaluate it yet. Just capture it.

Step 2: Filter Each Income Source

Now look at each income source and ask three simple questions:

• How much time does this require?

• Does this reset each year?

• Will this still pay me next year without extra effort?

Clarity usually begins when the answers sit next to each other.

The Difference Between Income That Resets and Income That Builds

Here is what many educators notice when they see their options side by side:

Income source	Time required	Resets each year	Pays again next year
Extra duties	High	Yes	No
Side work	Medium to high	Yes	No
Step increases	None	No	Yes (slowly)
Salary lane movement	Temporary upfront	No	Yes

This comparison often explains why so many professionals feel stuck. Most of the options they have been exposed to live in the “resets each year” column.

Step 3: Look for Patterns, Not Answers

This exercise is not about choosing the “right” path today.

It is about noticing patterns:

• Which options depend on your energy?

• Which ones disappear when life gets busy?

• Which ones quietly build without asking for more time every week?

Most educators discover they are investing energy into income streams that reset instead of build. That realization is not discouraging. It is strategic. It creates room to plan differently.

How Salary Lanes and Graduate Credits Increase Long-Term Income

If you want to take this exercise further, the next step is understanding how compensation structures actually function inside school systems.

This breakdown explains realistic ways school-based therapists increase income, including salary lanes, graduate credits, and long-term positioning:

👉 How to Make More Money as a School-Based Therapist: https://www.therapyadvancecourses.com/post/how-to-make-more-money-as-a-school-based-therapist 

If you want to see how certain choices quietly pay you back year after year, this article walks through the math:

👉 The Raise You Didn’t Know You Missed: https://www.therapyadvancecourses.com/post/the-raise-you-didn-t-know-you-missed-therapist-math-that-pays-you-back 

And if graduate credits are part of your long-term plan, you can explore self-paced options designed for school-based therapists here:

👉 Browse Self-Paced Courses: https://www.therapyadvancecourses.com/courses 

You do not need to decide anything today.

The goal is clarity, not urgency.

What the 3:1 Model Looks Like When You Actually Have Tools

The 3:1 model is not new. Most school-based therapists understand the concept.

Three weeks of direct service.

One week for planning, documentation, collaboration, and prep.

Where things get difficult is not the model itself.

It is managing it without support.

The version people talk about

In theory, the 3:1 model sounds structured and balanced.

In practice, many therapists experience unclear expectations for the “1” week, difficulty documenting indirect time, planning that feels scattered, and anxiety about whether they are “doing it right.”

Without tools, the model relies heavily on memory and mental load. The week meant to support your work can quickly turn into a blur of half-finished tasks and second-guessing.

The version therapists actually need

What changes everything is not more explanation.

It is infrastructure.

Therapists who feel more confident using the 3:1 model usually are not doing more during that week. They are relying on clear tools that help them plan once, document consistently, and adjust as needed instead of starting from scratch every cycle.

That difference matters, especially in school settings where schedules shift, caseloads grow, and expectations vary from building to building.

With tools vs without tools

Here is what that difference looks like side by side:

Without tools	With the 3:1 Model Toolkit
Guessing what counts as indirect time	Clear documentation forms
Replanning every 4 weeks	Reusable planning checklists
Stress about admin questions	Defensible structure
“Did I use this week well?”	Clear purpose for the week

This shift reduces decision fatigue and helps the model do what it was intended to do: support sustainable, effective practice.

Not to explain the model again. To make it usable.

It includes fillable documentation forms, reusable planning checklists, and a flexible schedule template so you are not reinventing your system every fourth week.

If you want the 3:1 model to feel structured instead of stressful, you can explore the Toolkit here: 👉 3:1 Model Toolkit 

Why this connects to long-term sustainability

Workload structure and income sustainability are more connected than most therapists are ever told.

When your workload depends on constant availability or extra effort, burnout tends to follow. When systems are in place, whether for scheduling, documentation, or income planning, your work becomes more predictable and easier to maintain.

If thinking about structure also makes you think about income, you’re not alone.

Short-term fixes like stipends and extra duties can help temporarily. But salary lane movement, graduate credits that count, and understanding how pay structures work tend to build over time.

We break that down here:

👉 What Actually Compounds in a School Career

 👉 Earn More, Stress Less: Free Guide for Educators:

The goal of the 3:1 model, like most things in schools, is not to do more.

It is to work within systems that support you year after year.

👉 3:1 Model Toolkit 

"The information and tools you provided helped me understand not only how to implement the model in practice, but also how to clearly explain its benefits to administrators. We implemented the 3:1 model this year for our inaugural year, and we are already seeing positive results. Thank you for giving me the tools and confidence to advocate for this model with administration." -Laurie, OT